# Fish Speech vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 ✓ | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-sonarqube