Fish Speechvssearcharr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | searcharr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #51 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 304 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.0 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 49/100 for searcharr, so it is the safer default.
searcharr ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, searcharr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →searcharr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep searcharr, compare it with