# Fish Speech vs scm-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | scm-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 53/100 for scm-manager, so it is the safer default.

scm-manager ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, scm-manager is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [scm-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-scm-manager