# Fish Speech vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +116 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-scanopy