# Fish Speech vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-scada-lts