# Fish Speech vs RSS Guard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | RSS Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 ✓ | 2 817 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 ✓ | +56 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 64/100 for RSS Guard, so it is the safer default.

RSS Guard ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+129 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [RSS Guard](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-rss-guard