Fish SpeechvsRAWGraphs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | RAWGraphs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 9 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 64/100 for RAWGraphs, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, RAWGraphs is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →RAWGraphs details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep RAWGraphs, compare it with