# Fish Speech vs rangarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | rangarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #85 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 ✓ | 265 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 47/100 for rangarr, so it is the safer default.

rangarr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, rangarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [rangarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/rangarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rangarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-rangarr