Fish SpeechvsRainbond
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Rainbond | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 6 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.
Rainbond ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Rainbond is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Rainbond details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Rainbond, compare it with