# Fish Speech vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-qwc2