# Fish Speech vs QloApps

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | QloApps |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 ✓ | 14 452 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-qloapps