# Fish Speech vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +232 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-pulse