# Fish Speech vs pr-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | pr-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 33 464 ✓ | 13 684 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +541 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, pr-agent is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-pr-agent