Fish Speechvsporta
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | porta | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.
porta ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, porta is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →porta details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep porta, compare it with