# Fish Speech vs Plausible Analytics

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Plausible Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 33 464 ✓ | 29 709 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +502 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Plausible Analytics ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+502 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-plausible-analytics