Fish SpeechvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 29 708 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +501 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Plausible Analytics ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+501 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Plausible Analytics details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Plausible Analytics, compare it with