Fish Speechvspaymenter
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | paymenter | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 2 811 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +500 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 68/100 for paymenter, so it is the safer default.
paymenter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, paymenter is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
paymenter is growing faster right now (+500 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →paymenter details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep paymenter, compare it with