# Fish Speech vs Otari

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Otari |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #14 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.33.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.

Otari ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Otari is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Otari](https://selfhost.directory/project/otari) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otari.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-otari