# Fish Speech vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-os-2