# Fish Speech vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 33 449 | 108 555 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +126 | +8 648 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+8 648 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-orca