# Fish Speech vs OpenWA

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | OpenWA |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 449 ✓ | 16 333 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +126 | +327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWA scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

OpenWA ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

OpenWA is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-openwa