Fish SpeechvsOpenWA
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | OpenWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 449 | 16 333 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +126 | +327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWA scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
OpenWA ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
OpenWA is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →OpenWA details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep OpenWA, compare it with