# Fish Speech vs OpenTTD

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | OpenTTD |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 ✓ | 8 436 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech and OpenTTD score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

OpenTTD ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenTTD is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [OpenTTD](https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-openttd