# Fish Speech vs Openship

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Openship |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 ✓ | 14 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 ✓ | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 67/100 for Openship, so it is the safer default.

Openship ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Openship is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Openship](https://selfhost.directory/project/openship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openship.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-openship