Fish SpeechvsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 33 450 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +127 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
OpenMapTiles ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenMapTiles is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+127 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →OpenMapTiles details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep OpenMapTiles, compare it with