Fish Speechvsopencut
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | opencut | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 | 96 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +6 099 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 099 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →opencut details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep opencut, compare it with