# Fish Speech vs OpenAgentd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | OpenAgentd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #34 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 33 455 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 65 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.35.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 51/100 for OpenAgentd, so it is the safer default.

OpenAgentd ships more often: 65 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenAgentd is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [OpenAgentd](https://selfhost.directory/project/openagentd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openagentd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-openagentd