# Fish Speech vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 33 464 | 82 382 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +3 366 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 366 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-omniroute