# Fish Speech vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 ✓ | 9 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 ✓ | +61 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech and Octoprint score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-octoprint