# Fish Speech vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 33 455 ✓ | 17 051 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 ✓ | +82 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-nomad