# Fish Speech vs NATS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 ✓ | 20 959 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +194 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, NATS is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-nats