Fish SpeechvsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 33 450 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +127 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+127 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →MQTTX Web details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with