# Fish Speech vs MeTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | MeTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 452 ✓ | 15 124 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | +287 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 48 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-metube