Fish Speechvsmediastorm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | mediastorm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #44 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 143 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | androidtv-native-latest · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for mediastorm, so it is the safer default.
mediastorm ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, mediastorm is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →mediastorm details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep mediastorm, compare it with