# Fish Speech vs media-journal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | media-journal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #97 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 ✓ | 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.31.3 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for media-journal, so it is the safer default.

media-journal ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, media-journal is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [media-journal](https://selfhost.directory/project/media-journal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/media-journal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-media-journal