Fish SpeechvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with