Fish SpeechvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with