Fish Speechvslogforge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | logforge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #28 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 302 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.
logforge ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, logforge is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →logforge details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep logforge, compare it with