# Fish Speech vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 132 722 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +3 267 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-llamacpp