# Fish Speech vs langflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 156 117 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +926 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-langflow