# Fish Speech vs Kong Gateway

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 44 321 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 ✓ | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Kong Gateway ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Kong Gateway is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-kong-gateway