# Fish Speech vs Invidious

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Invidious |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 ✓ | 25 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +1 032 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Crystal |

## Which one should you pick?

Invidious scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Invidious is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 032 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Invidious](https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-invidious