Fish Speechvshome-screens
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | home-screens | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 | 96 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v1.14.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 50/100 for home-screens, so it is the safer default.
home-screens ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, home-screens is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →home-screens details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep home-screens, compare it with