# Fish Speech vs Homarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | Homarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 5 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +455 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.9.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Homarr scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Homarr ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, Homarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Homarr is growing faster right now (+455 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [Homarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/homarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/homarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-homarr