Fish SpeechvsHomarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Homarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 | 5 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +455 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 43 |
| Latest release | — | v2.9.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Homarr scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Homarr ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Homarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Homarr is growing faster right now (+455 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Homarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Homarr, compare it with