# Fish Speech vs headscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | headscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 45 160 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +1 053 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

headscale ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, headscale is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 053 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-headscale