Fish Speechvsheadscale
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | headscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 45 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +1 047 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
headscale scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
headscale ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, headscale is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
headscale is growing faster right now (+1 047 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →headscale details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep headscale, compare it with