# Fish Speech vs hadoop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | hadoop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 ✓ | 15 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 ✓ | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-hadoop