# Fish Speech vs grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fish Speech | grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 77 583 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +690 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 53 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

grafana scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

grafana is growing faster right now (+690 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)
- [grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fish-speech-vs-grafana