Fish Speechvsgrafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 77 583 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +690 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 53 |
| Latest release | — | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
grafana is growing faster right now (+690 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep grafana, compare it with